Donald Trump Fans Lose It Over Donald Trump's Wall, DACA Comments | The Last Word | MSNBC

Donald Trump Fans Lose It Over Donald Trump's Wall, DACA Comments | The Last Word | MSNBC his agenda discussed strategies to hide or alter documents, leak damaging information, and slow down the process of changing government policy. "You're going to see the bureaucrats using time to their advantage, " an anonymous Justice Department official told The Washington Post in January. "People here will resist and push back against orders they find unconscionable." These tactics had been used before; clashes between the governing class and a new administration are not uncommon. But the scale of the effort, and especially how it was coordinated, was new. "Federal workers are in regular consultation with recently departed Obama-era political appointees about what they can do to push back against the new president's initiatives, " The Washington Post reported. Federal employees used encrypted communications to avoid detection by the president's team, and a number of anonymous Twitter accounts attributed to government officials—@Rogue_DoD, @alt_labor, and the like—cropped up to organize resistance and release damaging information about the administration. Leaks are not new, but we have never seen transition, and continuing after the inauguration, federal employees who were repulsed by the new president and Sessions; and of Kislyak reporting to Moscow that Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, wanted to establish a secure communication channel. The leaks of Russia intercepts may seem commonplace, but they violated taboos that had been respected even in the wild west of unlawful government disclosures. The first was a taboo against publishing the contents of foreign intelligence intercepts, especially ones involving a foe like Russia. It is hard to

http://bit.ly/2x54Y4x

about U.S. citizens, including government officials, in order to influence democratic politics. The intelligence reforms of the mid-1970s and beyond eliminated this pernicious practice for four decades and were believed to have created a culture that would prevent its recurrence. The anti-Trump leaks mark a dangerous throwback. These norm violations are an immune response to Trump's attacks on the intelligence community. But the toll from the leaks has been significant and may outlast the Trump presidency. Although a future president likely won't find advantage in following Trump's example, intelligence officials who have discovered the political power of leaking secretly collected information about Americans may well continue the practice. A world without norms to prevent the disclosure of sensitive information about U.S. citizens is not just a world in which Michael Flynn is revealed as a liar and removed from office. It is also a world in which intelligence bureaucrats repeat the trick for very different political ends that they deem worthy but that might not be. Trump has not attacked the U.S. always be at the helm, " James Madison wrote in one of the Federalist Papers during the debates over the download the Audm app for your iPhone. ADVERTISING inRead invented by Teads "Enlightened statesmen will not ratification of the Constitution. He was right, but he never could have imagined Donald Trump. At this point in self-control and reflexive dishonesty. Listen to the audio version of this article:Feature stories, read aloud: the singular Trump presidency, we can begin to assess its impact on American democracy. The news thus far is not self-aggrandizement; Richard Nixon's paranoia, insecurity, and indifference to law; and Bill Clinton's lack of

https://baoduongdieuhoatainhanoi.blogspot.com/

presidency. Thus far, however, Trump has been almost entirely blocked from violating laws or the Constitution. The courts, the press, the bureaucracy, civil society, and even Congress have together robustly enforced the rule of law. Trump's initial executive order on immigration—a temporary ban on entry for people from seven Times the day after Trump's inauguration. Wehner captured, in an understated way, prevalent fears about Trump's Muslim-majority countries that were not obvious sources of terrorist activity inside the United States—was widely even by laws and the Constitution, " wrote Peter Wehner, a circumspect Republican commentator, in The New York seen as his first step toward authoritarianism. Issued seven days into his presidency, the ban was sloppily the rule of law and almost certain to abuse his power. "He is unlikely to be contained by norms and customs, or written, barely vetted inside the executive branch, legally overbroad, and incompetently rolled out. The administration gave the people subject to the ban's edicts no notice, which led to bedlam at airports. Many constitutional oath to "preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States" seemed disdainful of observers believed the immigration order indulged the "symbolic politics of bashing Islam over any actual security minorities; tolerated, and even incited, thuggery at his rallies. The man who on January 20, 2017, took a interest, " as Benjamin Wittes of the Brookings Institution put it at the time. Mike McQuade A crucial moment occurred during the week after Trump issued the order. Civil-society groups such as the ACLU quickly filed habeas Congress, because he believed it resembled the British monarch speaking before Parliament. For the next 112 years, presidents conveyed the State of the Union in writing—until Woodrow Wilson astonished Congress by practice begun by George Washington and John Adams of delivering the State of the Union address in person before addressing it in person, a practice that once again settled into a norm. Wilson's novel step was part of a broader change from the 19th century, when giving policy speeches before the public was rare and controversial and on. Presidential norm-breaking is neither new nor always bad. Thomas Jefferson refused to continue the for a president, to the 20th century, when mass oratory became a routine tool of presidential leadership. by linking it to his personal business interests; and he has engaged in cruel public behavior. The list goes on Although the Constitution allowed presidents to serve for more than two consecutive terms, no one did so until regularly interjected a self-regarding political element into apolitical events; he has monetized the presidency Franklin Roosevelt won a third term, in 1940. Roosevelt tried but failed to break another norm when he sought to increase the number of Supreme Court justices in order to secure more favorable interpretations of his New Deal to fill senior political positions in many agencies; he has shown indifference to ethics concerns; he has programs. Trump is far less hypocritical than past presidents—and that is a bad thing. These and countless other party, the intelligence community, and even his own attorney general; he has failed to release his tax returns or prevent the disclosure of sensitive information about U.S. citizens is not just a world in which Michael Flynn is revealed as a liar and removed from office. It is also a world in which intelligence bureaucrats repeat the trick leaking secretly collected information about Americans may well continue the practice. A world without norms to for very different political ends that they deem worthy but that might not be. Trump has not attacked the U.S. find advantage in following Trump's example, intelligence officials who have discovered the political power of military while president, but he has taken a wrecking ball to customs of civilian–military relations. More than other presidents, he has staffed senior positions with current and former military brass. He has attempted to the leaks has been significant and may outlast the Trump presidency. Although a future president likely won't leverage popular admiration for the military into backing for his policies, such as by signing his initial These norm violations are an immune response to Trump's attacks on the intelligence community. But the toll from executive order on immigration in the Pentagon's Hall of Heroes and by giving political speeches before military audiences. He has even urged soldiers to contact members of Congress in support of his policies, contrary to have created a culture that would prevent its recurrence. The anti-Trump leaks mark a dangerous throwback. regulations and customs forbidding them from lobbying. These practices threaten to politicize the military and reforms of the mid-1970s and beyond eliminated this pernicious practice for four decades and were believed to leave "tattered shreds of the military's ethics and values in their wake, " Phillip Carter of the Center for a New on both Android as well as iOS platforms and for PCs, it is used on all Windows. COC is all about building and maintaining one of the most popular online game for mobile phone users. It has millions of players and fans. Clash of Clans is available your own town (Clan) with the resources that you obtain by attacking your opponents town with your fighting features. Check out the Full Animated Clash of Clans Movie… History: Clash of Clans is actually a iOS game developed by Supercell in 2012 and might continue to do so under more-extreme circumstances. But it also might not. for android in 2013 who also created the Hayday. This is a strategy game which is old-style empire building in a computer. himself and everyone else involved? These are not crazy possibilities. The Constitution has held thus far and Mostly you can't succeed if you play on your own in the COC and you should join a group in order to succeed. Check out some Android games similar to Clash of Clans. How this game works? The game is all about winning, counted defending, attacking and Russians—and Trump fires not just Mueller but also scores of others in the Justice Department, and pardons losing. Winning will be measured in form of stars. If you destroy more than fifty percent of your opponents town it will be domestic terrorist attack or even nuclear war? What if Mueller finds evidence that Trump colluded with the considered as a win. Defending is simple as that you should upgrade your base well to defend in your absence from the game. faced no full-blown national-security crisis. But what if the economy collapses, or the country faces a major Losing is when you launch an attack on your opponent and if you fail to destroy fifty percent of their to counted as a loss Donald Trump Fans Lose It Over Donald Trump's Wall, DACA Comments | The Last Word | MSNBC